Testy MKS-Vir2004 zestawienie:

Oprogramowanie komputerowe Problemy z oprogramowaniem
#1

Testy w laboratorium MKS-Vir2004 W Polsce zestawienie:

poniżej, raport:(procedura testu: oraz przebieg i wyniki %)

REPORT:

Discovered and tested MKS-Vir2004, from Poland. Surprisingly, this one with caught every sample perfectly on Medium Heuristics. Specifically, nearly 50 samples were picked up Heuristically giving it a perfect score of 321/321. However, when I increased Heuristics to “Super Deep”, it picked up an addition 10 more suspicious files. Upon further investigation, it was found that it was picking up signatures of hacktool utilities left over in some of the archives and flagging those files. Indeed, this is impressive. MKS-Vir2004 exhibits the most advanced detection algorithms i’ve ever seen, clearly it only had signatures for 271 of my samples, but through code emulation, it was able to pick up all 321 samples!! It clearly labeled the Heuristically found ones as things as “Likely Win32 Trojan” or “Highly Suspicious Acting File”. In addition, its scanning speed was incredibly quick, and its memory footprint was quite small. Impressive! Furthermore, this is a full featured and fairly polished product that appears to update at least once per day, and tech support responded to me within 5-15 minutes on my emails. Unfortunately, it appears to not be available in the US for purchase at this time.

1a) MKS_Vir 2004 - 321/321 0 Missed - 100%

1b) eXtendia AVK - 321/321 0 Missed - 100%

2a) Kaspersky 5.0 - 320/321 1 Missed - 99.70% (with Extended Database ON)

2b) McAfee VirusScan 8.0 - 319/321 + 2 (2 found as joke programs - heuristically) - 99%

  1. F-Secure - 319/321 2 Missed - 99.37%

  2. GData AVK - 317/321 4 Missed - 98.75%

  3. RAV + Norton (2 way tie) - 315/321 6 Missed - 98.13%

  4. Dr.Web - 310/321 11 Missed - 96.57%

  5. CommandAV + F-Prot + BitDefender (3 Way Tie) - 309/321 12 Missed - 96.26%

  6. ETrust - 301/321 20 Missed - 93.76%

  7. Trend - 300/321 21 Missed - 93.45%

  8. Avast! Pro - 299/321 22 Missed - 93.14%

  9. Panda - 298/321 23 Missed - 92.83%

  10. Virus Buster - 290/321 31 Missed - 90.34%

  11. KingSoft - 288/321 33 Missed - 89.71%

  12. NOD32 - 285/321 36 Missed (results identical with or without advanced heuristics) - 88.78%

  13. AVG Pro - 275/321 46 Missed - 85.66%

  14. AntiVIR - 268/321 53 Missed - 83.48%

  15. Antidote - 252/321 69 Missed - 78.50%

  16. ClamWIN - 247/321 74 Missed - 76.94%

  17. UNA - 222/321 99 Missed - 69.15%

  18. Norman - 215/321 106 Missed - 66.97%

  19. Solo - 182/321 139 Missed - 56.69%

  20. Fire AV - 179/321 142 Missed - 55.76%

  21. V3 Pro - 109/321 212 Missed - 33.95%

  22. Per_AV - 75/321 - 246 Missed - 23.36%

  23. Proland - 73/321 248 Missed - 22.74%

  24. Sophos - 50/321 271 Missed - 15.57%

  25. Hauri - 49/321 272 Missed - 15.26%

  26. CAT Quickheal - 21/321 300 Missed - 6%

  27. Vir_iT - 10/321 311 Missed - 3%

  28. Ikarus - Crashed on first virus. - 0%

#2

o matko… tak to jest jak się polacy za coś wezmą !!

#3

heheh ja tylko patrze na inne i maja racje wczoraj sciaglam takie pliki z wirusami po 590 wirkow i testowalam programy antywirosowe potem podam na forum wyniki i wkleje screeny zeby niebylo ze oszukuje bedizie czarno na bialo

a wyniki sa jak najbardziej trafne oprocz mks_vir normane, ale jak wiekszosc byla rodzimych wirkow to sie niedziw ze na 1. mijescu razem

eXtendia AVK

a na 2. Kaspersky 5.0 ,McAfee VirusScan 8.0 wspolnie

eXtendia AVK dwa silniki engine (KAV ,RAV), f-secure (Kav, Bitdefender i swoj) np. to sie niedziw ze sa najlepsze bo to chyba normane:

a mks jest dobry nawet bardzo, ale na rodzime wirki w naszym okregu wiec zobacz sobie avk czy kasper - DR.WEB - rosyj. ,Avas! czeski. te wszytkie maja baze naszych rodzimych wirkow

potem masz MCAfee - (ceniona firma skuteczny antywir) GData - Avk dwa silnik jak eXtendia AVK

Rav - Norton to samo miejsce, potem

DR.Web, CA Command AV - zobacz testy --Virus Bulletin-- i bedizesz wiedziec czemu tak wysoko ETrust tez CA,Trend PcCilin i Avast! wiadomo baza rodzimych wirkow i bakcylow

chyba wszystko juz jest jasno i naprawde tresty te potwierdzaja skutecznosc ,oraz oceny testerow programow antywir. czy znwcow antyw.

#4

Dziwisz sie - to ich baza -jak by mieli nie swoją bazę wirków tyklo Pandy wynik byłby całkiem inny.

Panda na swojej bazie też by miała 100%